49016 Posts in 338 Topics- by 1233 Members - Latest Member: seveauthesk

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 13
  Print  
Author Topic: What did you think of the art?  (Read 37735 times)
Troublerocks
Time Paradox Winners
Hero Member
*
Posts: 1188



« Reply #15 on: June 30, 2008, 04:46:27 PM »

Anyone who suggests a new artist will have their brain removed through their nose with an imaginary toothpic. WEll, not really, but you can see I don't like the idea of a new artist.  Tongue

The art is beautiful!  Kiss

But Foaly being green scared me....  Lips sealed
Logged

Sorry Everyone - but I'm leaving. :'(

Thanks for a great time here on EC.

XXXX

Troublerocks

XXXXXXXXX
SnowWolfGirl
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 735


Fun in the SUN! uhh... I meant Snow... grrr brrr!!


« Reply #16 on: July 05, 2008, 09:12:47 AM »

if thats what you think, then kay (yes, that IS scary) but this is a place to express your own personally opinions and my opinion says that the art coulld be better. if your going to make a graphic novel based on a book/novel, you should at least make sure that all of the major details regarding what a character looks like are correct.
Logged

Wolf I am
In darkness
in light
wherever I search
wherever I run
wherever I stand
everything will be good
because Maheo protects us.
Ea ea ea ho.

-Tsistsistas (Cheyenne) Wolf Song


T.W.M.B
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 99



« Reply #17 on: July 16, 2008, 12:13:49 PM »

I thought the graphic novel was pretty good, but I'm just abit unhappy about the style of art Sad. Holly looked way too tall, Foaly looked abit too monkey-like and Mulch didn't look like a drawf at all, Juliet was overally skinny (no offence), and they also need to work abit more on the colours, they practically used brown and green for the whole comic and splashed a few bits of colours in different places, but these are just my opinions.  Tongue
Logged

T.W.M.B. Stands for "That would be me"... but as you might have noticed... I swapped the "M" and "B" around. This is no mistake. Cheesy Just to give my boring name a few changes.
Troublerocks
Time Paradox Winners
Hero Member
*
Posts: 1188



« Reply #18 on: July 18, 2008, 03:43:17 PM »

Yeah - I Juliet was a wrestler. Not a model.

 Tongue
Logged

Sorry Everyone - but I'm leaving. :'(

Thanks for a great time here on EC.

XXXX

Troublerocks

XXXXXXXXX
Shadow
Newbie
*
Posts: 4


« Reply #19 on: July 19, 2008, 05:34:15 AM »

Holly was too tall, yeah.

But she was hot, though. *Gets prepared for the massive storm*

Foaly was weird lookng, I think. He wasn't ugly, but he wasn't exactly how I pictured him, either.

Butler and Artemis looked exactly how I pictured them. That was cool.

Also, at one point in the book, i totally forget when, but Artemis was in the midle of two conflicting light sources. One of his eyes look blue, and the other lokoed hazel. I dunno if that was accidental or purposful, but I thought it was neat.

*EDIT* I found it! On page..eh...it doens' have page counters >.>

But it's on the page when Artemis was talking about being uncomfortable with his scheme because Holly looks so human.
« Last Edit: July 19, 2008, 01:39:26 PM by Shadow » Logged

Artemis/Holly shipper for LIFE!!

I KNEW IT WOULD (almost) HAPPEN!

And it WILL. Just you all wait...just you wait....
sasquatch_223
Newbie
*
Posts: 36



« Reply #20 on: July 23, 2008, 05:23:20 AM »

I thought the adaption and all was great, but the illustrations were kinda... UGH.  Foaly's green, Butler's head is tiny, Holly is too tall, and Artemis looks like a vampire.  Don't get me wrong, I don't dislike the GN, but the art was just... wrong.  To me.
Logged

Love me for who I am and not for what I ship.
I have AIM.  The profile thing just won't let me enter my extravagantly long username.  So message me if you want it.
dxterity
Newbie
*
Posts: 6


Say hi to Clyde!


« Reply #21 on: July 23, 2008, 07:47:07 AM »

Yeah, I agree Foaly's depiction was a little too... shocking. Green, and more horse than human when he's supposed to be a more-or-less balanced mix of both. And yes, Holly is too tall, her hair is a bit too neat/long, Butler looks more Caucasian than Eurasian. And the most serious problem is that Artemis has BROWN eyes when they're supposed to be blue! (Considering how his eye colour is so often mentioned [and eventually changed] in the rest of the books...)

The illustrations are fine I suppose. But because it's done in the traditional graphic novel way, it becomes so much more serious when humour is a very important element in the series. (Which is why the 'I don't like lollipops' part got axed, along with all the other jokes...)

Maybe AF in manga form instead of GN would do more justice to the humour. But then again, that's a rather scary thought.  Tongue
Logged

"Confidence is ignorance. If you're feeling cocky, it's because there's something you don't know."
Isabella
Newbie
*
Posts: 28



« Reply #22 on: July 23, 2008, 05:10:15 PM »

I like the graphic novel. I have to admit that I didn't really notice any of the mistakes in the artwork - I found that some of the characters didn't look the way I imagined them, but I find the same problem whem books are made into films. Personally, when I then re-read the books, I find I can still imagine the characters the way I did before, unless I liked the film/graphic novel version better. I like the graphic novel format. My only issue with it is that I don't think people should JUST read the graphic novel because they'd miss a lot, but that has nothing to do with the artwork, really.
Logged

Icon from here
Foaly222
Full Member
***
Posts: 169


Fear my leet skills!


WWW
« Reply #23 on: July 27, 2008, 09:08:30 PM »

the graphic was terrible, i hated how artemis looked so childish and everything i would have excpecded something much more formal and am dissopointed.
Logged

Save the spam for your sandwhich
Check out http://artemisfowlfansite.wetpaint.com/?t=anon!for a good time.
Troublerocks
Time Paradox Winners
Hero Member
*
Posts: 1188



« Reply #24 on: July 30, 2008, 07:42:48 PM »

I think that was the uniqueness of the ART!   Angry

I loved the GN and cant wait for number 2!  Grin
Logged

Sorry Everyone - but I'm leaving. :'(

Thanks for a great time here on EC.

XXXX

Troublerocks

XXXXXXXXX
tennis2G92
Full Member
***
Posts: 216



« Reply #25 on: August 07, 2008, 08:16:32 PM »

I liked the art of the comic.  I thought Mulch looked pretty awesome!  Grin  I didn't picture him like that at all, but that's what makes it all the better.
Logged
T.W.M.B
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 99



« Reply #26 on: August 14, 2008, 02:39:22 PM »

The graphic novel was a lot less humourous than the book.  Undecided but at least it stuck to the main storyline.  Grin
Logged

T.W.M.B. Stands for "That would be me"... but as you might have noticed... I swapped the "M" and "B" around. This is no mistake. Cheesy Just to give my boring name a few changes.
dolphincat1
Newbie
*
Posts: 19



« Reply #27 on: August 17, 2008, 06:52:10 AM »

I quite liked the art, but nobody looked like I'd imagined them to look. Especially Butler- I thought his head was too small and his neck too big. But it wasn't that bad...
Logged
Uruviel
Newbie
*
Posts: 33


« Reply #28 on: August 19, 2008, 08:02:37 AM »

i did not read the book but the drawings looked nice. Smiley
Logged
crean_puffz
Guest
« Reply #29 on: August 23, 2008, 02:04:57 AM »

I didnt actually see the book in real life but I saw it via internet and here are my comments.

artemis was ok

holly was pretty

juliet:too pretty, but pretty nevertheless

root: WTF?!

butler: same reation as roots

mulch: i got better drawings from fan art.

trouble: all the male LEP fairies looked the same o_O
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 13
  Print  
 
Jump to: